Antennas, Antenna Cables, Wireless Products: Technical Articles
WiFi Network Standards Compared: 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E, 802.11ac
Table of Contents
Wi-Fi 6 & 6E Compared to 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) and 802.11n (Wireless-N)
- Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) operates in both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands.
- Wi-Fi 6E is an extension of Wi-Fi 6 that adds access to the entire 6 GHz band, expanding usable spectrum from 5.925 GHz up to 7.125 GHz.
- 802.11ac, also known as Wi-Fi 5, operates exclusively in the 5 GHz band.
- Older standards such as 802.11n, 802.11g, and earlier primarily used the 2.4 GHz frequency band, with 5 GHz being optional for some 802.11n devices.
Standard | Wi-Fi Name | Frequency Bands | Max Theoretical Speed |
802.11n | Wi-Fi 4 | 2.4 GHz / optional 5 GHz | ~600 Mbps |
802.11ac | Wi-Fi 5 | 5 GHz only | ~6.9 Gbps |
802.11ax | Wi-Fi 6 | 2.4 & 5 GHz | ~9.6 Gbps |
802.11ax (6E) | Wi-Fi 6E | 2.4, 5 & 6 GHz | ~9.6 Gbps |

Advantages of 802.11ac over 802.11n
Advantages of 802.11ac over 802.11n
802.11ac introduced several major improvements over 802.11n, resulting in significantly higher throughput and better performance in dense environments:
Greater use of the 5 GHz band: While 802.11n can operate on both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, many implementations favored 2.4 GHz due to cost. 802.11ac operates exclusively on 5 GHz, which is far less congested and subject to less interference. A quality Wi-Fi antenna fitted to a 5GHz router improves its range within usable distances. 2.4 GHz is optional with 802.11ac
Wider channels: 802.11ac supports 80 MHz and optional 160 MHz channel widths, compared to 802.11n’s maximum of 40 MHz. Wider channels allow much higher data rates. The high-density modulation allows 256 different signals to be transmitted over the same frequency by phase shifting each signal; this improves the spectral efficiency up to 4 times over 802.11n
256-QAM modulation: This higher-density modulation scheme increases throughput by approximately 33% compared to 64-QAM used in 802.11n.
MU-MIMO: Multi-User MIMO allows an access point to transmit data to multiple devices simultaneously, whereas 802.11n serves devices sequentially.
Higher MIMO capability: 802.11ac supports up to 8 spatial streams (8×8 MIMO), compared to 802.11n’s maximum of 4.
Standardized beamforming: Beamforming focuses RF energy toward the client device, improving signal strength, consistency, and power efficiency.
All of the advantages combined result in 802.11ac having a combined multiple-station throughput of at least 1Gbs and a singular throughput of at least 500Mbs through a single link. 802.11ac features a wider bandwidth of 160MHz, up to 8 MIMO special streams, higher density modulation of 256 QAM, and up to 4 simultaneous downlink users.
You will attain all of these benefits only if all the APs and devices in the network are 802.11ac. Otherwise, you would have the same performance with 802.11ac as with 802.11n.
Despite the significant differences between the two standards, 802.11ac is fully backward compatible with 802.11n. devices that feature a dual frequency receiver can easily switch between the two standards. While 802.11ac is backward compatible with 802.11n, legacy devices may reduce overall network efficiency when connected to newer access points.

The IEEE 802.11ac is a wireless Wi-Fi standard developed within 2008-2013 to provide high-throughput connectivity across the 5GHZ band. The standard is an improvement on the earlier 802.11n wireless standard transmitting via the 2.4GHz frequency band.
Application-Specific Advantages:
Streaming media on a local-area network: 802.11ac is best choice because of the much higher throughput.
802.11n wireless adapters only work optimally when connecting to a 802.11n that's operating in 802.11n mode.
Frequency Ranges of the 802.11 network-types:
Wi-Fi 6E – 6 GHz. The 6 GHz band provides clean spectrum with no legacy devices, enabling wider channels, lower latency, and reduced interference—ideal for high-density environments.
5 GHz (a/n/ac/ax)
2.4 GHz (b/g/n/ax)
900 MHz (802.11ah / HaLow)
60 GHz (802.11ad / ay)
WiFi frequency advantages and disadvantages
WiFi is operable at the following frequencies, with more capacity being aggressively sought in other parts of the radio frequency spectrum as the more congested frequencies being prone to interference. This had led to the expansion of WiFi into the sub microwave and microwave frequencies though coverage is decidedly lower.
- 2.4 GHz frequency band is commonly used for WiFi as this is typically unlicensed around the world. 802.11b/g/n specifies the use of this frequency which provides good coverage and penetration. This frequency band does suffer a lot of interference from other wireless products that use it, including microwave ovens, cordless phones, and wireless technologies like Bluetooth and ZigBee.
- 5 GHz WiFi is specified by 802.11a/h/j/n/ac/ax. It has a far greater capacity than its lower frequency counterparts with up to 23 distinct channels, but lower coverage and penetration of walls.
- 5.9 GHz is currently allocated for Intelligent Transport Systems but has been aggressively targeted for WiFi but has faced pushback from the automotive industry who feel that sharing this band may be a transport safety risk.
- 900 MHz known as WiFi HaLo utilizes the 900 MHz ISM band to provide longer range WiFi coverage with lower energy consumption. Its protocol 802.11ah was published in 2017.
- 6 GHz or the Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) frequency band has an allocation of about 500 MHz for use by WiFi according to the WiFi 6 protocol.
- 60 GHz was devised by the Wireless Gigabit Alliance who merged with the WiFi Alliance to publish the standard 802.11ad. Operating at such a high frequency allows high speed and volume data transfer, especially as there are relatively vast amounts of unallocated spectrum around this frequency. However, coverage is drastically reduced compared to lower frequency networks, often limited to the same room. It is intended to be used alongside lower frequencies or be used as a cable replacement for a short distance, high traffic wireless links.
802.11N (Also called Wireless-N):
WIRELESS-N (802.11n) is the previous generation of wireless networking technology - prior to 802.11ac. 802.11n enables speeds up to 300Mbps and is backward compatible with 802.11g & 802.11b.
802.11n built upon the previous 802.11G standard by adding two new technologies:
- Frame Aggregation technology: Increases throughput by sending two or more data frames in a single transmission.
- MIMO
11n products have one of the following: "3 TX + 3 RX" , "2TX + 2RX" and "1TX + 1RX" ~ all of them using MIMO technology. "1TX + 1RX", products only have one antenna.
802.11N is mostly in the 2.4GHz frequency band. 5GHz is an optional component that most manufacturers ignore in favor of the cheaper, and much more congested 2.4GHz.
We offer a dual-band antenna for 2.4 GHz band and 5.x GHz band
802.11a uses the frequency range 5.2 to 5.8GHz:
This range of frequencies is much less used than 2.4GHz
802.11a allows for use of so many channels that you don't have to worry about interference between access points. In the U.S., 802.11a offers eight non-overlapping channels vs. three channels shared by 802.11b and 802.11g. If the company or department next door (or upstairs or downstairs) has an 802.11a network, more channels makes it easier to configure your 802.11a network to avoid interference. In dense installations, extra channels can make 802.11a networks up to 14 times faster than 802.11b networks.
If you operate a wireless adapter that's made for wireless-N, on a 802.11B/G network, will have lesser performance/signal strength than a 802.11G adapter of similar standards
We reached these conclusions based in part by comparing the Alfa 1000mw G version and the Alfa 2000mw N version. AWUS036H is the G version; AWUS036NH is the N version.
Connecting to a 802.11G network? Then an 802.11G wireless USB adapter will perform better than an 802.11n USB adapter
- 802.11b will provide better range/distance than 802.11g
- 802.11g cards automatically select 802.11b mode for long-distance connection
802.11B for Long Distance Links on Older Gear
If you are trying to reach a distant or weak network signal for internet access, 802.11b will provide better range/distance than 802.11g, and 802.11b provides plenty of bandwidth for internet access at broadband-speed.
For longer-distance links, your wireless card/ USB adapter will automatically select a lower-bandwidth data-rate: Therefore will automatically select 802.11b mode. Many people assume that 802.11g mode is better than 802.11b for their situation. However:
If range matters more than bandwidth requirements, run your card/adapter in 802.11b mode: 802.11b has better range and penetration. Its throughput will degrade less with the same distance and obstacles. This scenario is applicable for internet access for web-surfing and email access: If you are using the connection just for web-surfing and email access, your bandwidth bottleneck is the Internet connection - not the "B" bandwidth. If you are using the connection for local-area networking that requires a lot of bandwidth (file-sharing, streaming media on the local network), then you should use 802.11g mode or 802.11n mode.
An 802.11g access point will support clients operating in either 802.11b or 802.11g mode. Similarly, a laptop with an 802.11g card is able to access 802.11b access points as well as 802.11g access points. 802.11b and g clients (cards) automatically select the best data rate, based on available signal strength. For longer-distance links, a lower data-rate will be selected. Therefore, for longer distance links or links that have some obstruction (no clear line of sight), there is no added benefit in having an 802.11g client as compared to an 802.11b client.
The selected data rate will be either 1, 2, 5.5 or 11 Mbps: The rate selected is influenced by signal-strength factors such as the distance between the access point and client-radio, and the degree of openness of the line-of-sight, versus obstruction of the line-of-sight by any type of object. For the longest-distance links, the lowest data rate will be selected, and for the short-distance links with no obstructions, the highest data rate will be selected.
Many major WiFi implementations, such as municipality-wide and in apartment complexes, were using 802.11b as late as 2018 in network implementations: The reasons are:
- G requires use of three different channels simultaneously, and the network implementation may have a constraint to not lock up three channels
- B is fast enough and lower-cost (with actual throughput of 1 to 6 Mbps exceeding the Internet connection speed).
- Any B client on an 802.11g network will force the access point to operate in B mode, so that the bandwidth advantages of G are nullified.
802.11b equipment can transmit data-frames at rates up to 11 Mbps, and the network protocol overhead reduces the actual/net data-transmission rate to 5-6 Mbps.
A laptop's battery-charge will last longer with 802.11b, because it consumes less power than either 802.11g or 802.11a.
The 802.11b Wi-Fi standard is still in use in 2024, albeit its prevalence has greatly diminished compared to newer standards like 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) and 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6). Originally ratified in 1999, 802.11b was one of the first widely adopted Wi-Fi standards, offering speeds up to 11 Mbps.
Despite its slow speed by modern standards and inefficiency in spectrum usage, 802.11b can still be found in some environments, particularly in older equipment or in specific setups where compatibility with legacy devices is necessary. However, most modern wireless networks and devices use more advanced and faster standards, which also provide better security features and efficient use of the radio spectrum.
Which Wi-Fi Standard Should You Choose?
Wi-Fi 6E: Best for high-density, low-latency, interference-free environments.
Wi-Fi 6: Ideal for mixed-device networks with many clients.
802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5): Excellent performance for most 5 GHz networks.
802.11n / b / g: Best suited for legacy equipment, long-range, or low-bandwidth applications.
FAQs
What’s the difference between Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E?
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) operates on 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, while Wi-Fi 6E is an extension of Wi-Fi 6 that adds the 6 GHz band (from 5.925 GHz up to 7.125 GHz). The big advantage of 6E is cleaner spectrum with fewer legacy devices, which can reduce interference and latency in busy environments.
What frequency bands do Wi-Fi 4, 5, 6, and 6E use?
- 802.11n (Wi-Fi 4): 2.4 GHz (most common) with optional 5 GHz
- 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5): 5 GHz only
- 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6): 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
- Wi-Fi 6E: 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz + 6 GHz
Why is 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) usually faster than 802.11n (Wi-Fi 4)?
802.11ac introduced major upgrades over 802.11n, including:
- More use of 5 GHz (typically less congested than 2.4 GHz)
- Wider channels (80 MHz and optional 160 MHz vs. 40 MHz max on 802.11n)
- 256-QAM modulation (about 33% throughput improvement vs. 64-QAM)
- MU-MIMO, more spatial streams (up to 8×8 MIMO), and beamforming
If I buy a Wi-Fi 6 or 6E router, will my older devices still work?
Yes. Newer routers are generally backward compatible with older Wi-Fi standards (like 802.11n/ac). However, legacy devices can reduce overall network efficiency, especially in busy networks, because the router may spend airtime supporting older modes.
Why does 5 GHz often feel “better” than 2.4 GHz?
In many environments, 5 GHz is less congested and offers more available channels, which can improve stability and speed—especially for streaming and higher-throughput local networking. The tradeoff is that 5 GHz usually has less wall penetration and range than 2.4 GHz.
When does it make sense to use an older standard like 802.11b/g/n?
Older standards can still be useful in special cases:
- Long-distance or weak-signal links where range matters more than speed
- Legacy device compatibility (older equipment that can’t connect to newer modes)
- Low-bandwidth needs like basic internet browsing/email, where the bottleneck is the ISP connection, not Wi-Fi
In some long-range scenarios, devices may automatically drop to lower rates (even 802.11b) to maintain reliability.
Which Wi-Fi standard should I choose for my situation?
- Wi-Fi 6E: Best for high-density, low-latency, interference-sensitive environments (more clean spectrum)
- Wi-Fi 6: Best for mixed-device networks with many clients
- Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac): Excellent choice for most 5 GHz networks and streaming
- Wi-Fi 4 / b / g: Best for legacy gear, long-range, or low-bandwidth use cases





